The buildings reflect light, unlike their Hobbit-hollow-on-the-road-to-Mordor predecessors. The streets now actually resemble city streets, boulevards even. There are mixed heights together with widened perspectives. The buildings appear better spaced and the space between buildings no longer looks like an afterthought. The glazing and cladding reference the sky and the lake. A new aquatic community centre is being built to replace the old, odd one that is attached to a smokestack. This is a great thing for Regent Park. It actually looks like a part of Toronto.

There will be integrated stores and banks and underground parking. Mixed use and mixed income are the catchphrases.

But despite the Regent revitalization being in-step with the design-times, there is a creeping sense of deja vu. Is it possible that this might not be the “fix” for that the troubled neighborhood that everyone envisions? Someone dreamt up the previous incarnation with some set of “ideals” in mind. Is the concept of affordable housing in Toronto as now as the new buildings? Will the new buildings transform the old community?

This is not a question that can be answered now or even soon. Despite the good looks and good neighborhood planning and great ideas about mixed income cohabitation, this is an experiment in social housing, and the concepts are really hypotheses about what makes good public housing. How do we define the good in this case? What outcomes are most desirable? Only the next 20 years will tell whether the new Regent Park is more successful than the old.

In the meantime, there is an excellent website that reminds us that the road to social housing hell is paved with good design-driven intentions and that the devil is in the details. Top down design did not bring the bottom up. Not in these cases.

Peruse these (in)famous public housing projects and judge the odds on Regent Park for yourself. I think they are better than even.

http://www.oobject.com/category/15-housing-projects-from-hell

This video highlights Charles’ keynote presentation at Creative Places + Spaces where he underlines how innovating bureaucracy is the challenge for everyone to turn their cities into great places. Landry believes that if we can make government more creative and more collaborative, we make our communities better.

This video highlights the unique challenges of the NFB’s pilot project Filmmaker-in-Residence. Katerina Cizek, is Filmmaker-in-Residence at St. Michael`s hospital, working with partners on the frontline: doctors, nurses, researchers and patients. From local projects at the Inner City Health Unit, to global ones, FIR partners media with medicine in innovative ways.

What happens when a hospital and a filmmaker collaborate with homeless youth, medical staff, police officers and cyclists?

Is it?

As much as I would like to think so, I have bumped into (literally) many photographers on the same unique visual journey as me.

Well, maybe the photo is unique but the trip is not. Eric Fischer used Flickr geotags and strings of PERL programming to produce a beguiling set of minimalist maps that turn Flickr geotags into vectors that map out where people walk around, photographing. Called the The Geotaggers’ World Atlas, the series of maps in ultrafine red and black lines show where people are snapping pictures in major cities. Toronto is mapped.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/walkingsf/sets/72157623971287575/

The maps are not interactive, yet, but they are nonetheless remarkable visualizations of human photographing behaviour.

And if you are a flickerite who geotags their photos, then you helped create this map.

Top Up has come to my neighbourhood. Born in the upper crusty Leasides in the 90s it crept across the Millwood bridge and has reproduced on every street. Beige stuccoed boxes are replacing homegrown, affordable, in-need-of-love worker’s cottages and three bedroom homes. The decharacterization of East York has begun.

My five year old thinks it grand. Every day in building season there is a different place to see mighty machines and work, beating down the old worker’s cottages and bungalows, gouging out new basements and delivering cement.

The first one was a welcome surprise. An old, Bonanza-style shack disappeared overnight. I was happy to see it go. In my little hometown across the lake, a dog barking from the porch was met with a ‘Shut Up Rusty” from the owner. When the hounds barked from this porch, the owners peered out the window and nary a scold was issued. Hmmm. Can only mean that Bad Guys lived there. A modest, salmon coloured stucco back split, new but not showy replaced it. The contractor lives in it with his family.

The second occupier is pretty horrible to look at. Kitty corner to the Bonanza replacement, Two viennese pastry squares, frosted with stucco and hackneyed Hapsburg details, with hideously mismatched wooden fencing and builder style decks sprang up. I want to say they weren’t that bad. I want to.

I figured it was isolated. Then one fine morning, holes starting appearing on my block. Within a few months, two tall and thin stuccoed domiciles occupied centre stage on the street. My house was no longer the tallest. Neighbours started talking about stuccoing their facades.

At first I was enthusiastic. The presence of these modern domiciles will make my property value rise, right? They have replaced some incredibly ugly wood framed homes that looked like badly concealed double wide trailers.

Does this tear down, top-up trend represent the vanguard of gentrification for my neighbourhood? Do I really want it gentrified like this?

I future posts I am going to explore: (1) Can we be the next Leslieville if the creative types can’t afford the downstroke? (2) Who is putting these houses up and why and (3) Why do they look like they do?

Stay tuned….

He reflects back at other periods of economic crisis such as the Great Depression of the 1930s and the Long Depression of the late nineteenth century and suggests that these periods of ‘reset’ are great opportunities to remake our economy and help cities thrive.

“Florida identifies the patterns that will drive the next Great Reset and transform virtually every aspect of our lives — from how and where we live, to how we work, to how we invest in individuals and infrastructure, to how we shape our cities and regions. Florida shows how these forces, when combined, will spur a fresh era of growth and prosperity, define a new geography of progress, and create surprising opportunities for all of us. Among these forces will be

* new patterns of consumption, and new attitudes toward ownership that are less centered on houses and cars
* the transformation of millions of service jobs into middle class careers that engage workers as a source of innovation
* new forms of infrastructure that speed the movement of people, goods, and ideas
* a radically altered and much denser economic landscape organized around “megaregions” that will drive the development of new industries, new jobs, and a whole new way of life”

(www. randomhouse.ca)

www.creativeclass.com

In March 2010 CURL partnered up with Artscape and The Firehouse to produce a series of 8 videos from the Creative Places & Spaces conference which took place on October 29-20, 2009 in Toronto . We hope that these video will spark some discussion about the idea of a creative and collaborative city.